Last week the Eutropian Conference started working in the different groups on Immigration and Integration.
While “The Brynn” did not mention anything about the first meeting of group 1 and 2 on Monday, “The Eutropian Independent” (EI) stated in their article “The First Working Groups” from the 24th of November, that “the group delegates discussed legal immigration including visa related issues, and which qualifications an aspirant for a citizenship should possess.” The EI described the process of discussion like a “list of statements instead of a real conversation”.
The meeting of group 2 was moderated by a delegate of Brynnland. They “collected topics for further discussions” on Wednesday. Whereas the first discussion was productive, the second turned out to be rather unstructured and ineffective”, states the EI.
“The Brynn” called the first meeting of group 3 and 4 on Tuesday “Goodwill Hunting” in their article from the same day, 25th of November.
The Topics of the second day of conference this week were “Human Rights and Integration” for group 3 and “Relationships with Migrant’s Countries of Origin” for working group 4.
Regarding to “The Brynn”, the International Association for Human Rights working in group 3 spoke “the naked truth” by saying that ”Although most governments theoretically provide for freedom of religion, speech, press and peaceful assembly and association, some of them do not provide for sufficient control and adequate protection against violaters.”. Although this statement lead to a vivid discussion, group 3 seemed to have drifted of their topic for a little while. The EI called the announcement of the International Association for Human Rights accusing some governments.
The working atmosphere in group 4 seemed to have “started quite unprofessional, until Brynnland stated that they do not want to have anymore conferences and congresses, but results.” Apart from these problems at the beginning, group 4 also managed to agree on certain topics, as “The Brynn” says.
The EI stated that group 4 came to some agreements, as “Brynnland suggested to build an EF organization to coordinate the issues of international relations. A possible name would be “EDCE – Eutropian Department of Cultural Exchange”.”
Both of the newspapers realized that Eastland was not taken very seriously in the discussion of working group 3.
In their article „Who will be Eutropia´s Next Top Immigrant?” from November 25th the EI calls “Immigration, legal and illegal, is an omnipresent problem in the Eutropian Federation, whereas the latter is affecting some countries more severely than others.” The International Association for Human Rights “assumed the role of a social watchdog at the conference”, while the delegates of group 3 focused on their different views of legal immigration. “During the one hour conference the delegates of the countries compared their images of the perfect immigrant for their country in order to have unified standards in the near future.” Another idea with which the EI came up with was to “assemble a jury which can find Eutropia’s Next Top Immigrant. Each immigrant has two minutes in front of the jury, explaining why they are worthy to live in their beautiful federation.” In our opinion ironic statements like this one are not very helpful, but maybe it will make the delegates think about the dimension of the topic again. Furthermore the EI states, that “the criteria which qualify an immigrant mentioned in this meeting were rather preposterous.”
While “The Brynn” stated “DO something, do NOT only talk about it.” And “Hopefully delegates get to real work on the next conference”, “The Eutropian Independent” said “losing the focus was the reason why the delegates struggled so hard to come to a “fruitful” conclusion – as Indianaland might state it.”.
In their comment “Don´t TALK…Just WORK” from the 26th of November, “The Brynn” stated: “Indeed concerns about risks such as exploitation and discrimination were voiced, but did not enjoy any serious treatment. Instead, some delegates switched to another topic regardless of, as formerly mentioned, the diversity of opinions.”
“As a conclusion, the delegates made a good job in both working groups and Eutropia is eagerly looking forward to Thursday's further discussions”, said the EI.
While “The Brynn” did not mention anything about the first meeting of group 1 and 2 on Monday, “The Eutropian Independent” (EI) stated in their article “The First Working Groups” from the 24th of November, that “the group delegates discussed legal immigration including visa related issues, and which qualifications an aspirant for a citizenship should possess.” The EI described the process of discussion like a “list of statements instead of a real conversation”.
The meeting of group 2 was moderated by a delegate of Brynnland. They “collected topics for further discussions” on Wednesday. Whereas the first discussion was productive, the second turned out to be rather unstructured and ineffective”, states the EI.
“The Brynn” called the first meeting of group 3 and 4 on Tuesday “Goodwill Hunting” in their article from the same day, 25th of November.
The Topics of the second day of conference this week were “Human Rights and Integration” for group 3 and “Relationships with Migrant’s Countries of Origin” for working group 4.
Regarding to “The Brynn”, the International Association for Human Rights working in group 3 spoke “the naked truth” by saying that ”Although most governments theoretically provide for freedom of religion, speech, press and peaceful assembly and association, some of them do not provide for sufficient control and adequate protection against violaters.”. Although this statement lead to a vivid discussion, group 3 seemed to have drifted of their topic for a little while. The EI called the announcement of the International Association for Human Rights accusing some governments.
The working atmosphere in group 4 seemed to have “started quite unprofessional, until Brynnland stated that they do not want to have anymore conferences and congresses, but results.” Apart from these problems at the beginning, group 4 also managed to agree on certain topics, as “The Brynn” says.
The EI stated that group 4 came to some agreements, as “Brynnland suggested to build an EF organization to coordinate the issues of international relations. A possible name would be “EDCE – Eutropian Department of Cultural Exchange”.”
Both of the newspapers realized that Eastland was not taken very seriously in the discussion of working group 3.
In their article „Who will be Eutropia´s Next Top Immigrant?” from November 25th the EI calls “Immigration, legal and illegal, is an omnipresent problem in the Eutropian Federation, whereas the latter is affecting some countries more severely than others.” The International Association for Human Rights “assumed the role of a social watchdog at the conference”, while the delegates of group 3 focused on their different views of legal immigration. “During the one hour conference the delegates of the countries compared their images of the perfect immigrant for their country in order to have unified standards in the near future.” Another idea with which the EI came up with was to “assemble a jury which can find Eutropia’s Next Top Immigrant. Each immigrant has two minutes in front of the jury, explaining why they are worthy to live in their beautiful federation.” In our opinion ironic statements like this one are not very helpful, but maybe it will make the delegates think about the dimension of the topic again. Furthermore the EI states, that “the criteria which qualify an immigrant mentioned in this meeting were rather preposterous.”
While “The Brynn” stated “DO something, do NOT only talk about it.” And “Hopefully delegates get to real work on the next conference”, “The Eutropian Independent” said “losing the focus was the reason why the delegates struggled so hard to come to a “fruitful” conclusion – as Indianaland might state it.”.
In their comment “Don´t TALK…Just WORK” from the 26th of November, “The Brynn” stated: “Indeed concerns about risks such as exploitation and discrimination were voiced, but did not enjoy any serious treatment. Instead, some delegates switched to another topic regardless of, as formerly mentioned, the diversity of opinions.”
“As a conclusion, the delegates made a good job in both working groups and Eutropia is eagerly looking forward to Thursday's further discussions”, said the EI.
No comments:
Post a Comment